![]() ![]() Scripts are a reflection of the power dynamics embedded in cultural norms and behaviors, including the norms that privilege men over women and those that perpetuate cisnormativity, heteronormativity, and mononormativity. The heterosexual script further describes the ways that men and women (also positioned as the only genders) hold complementary but starkly unequal roles for romance and sexual interaction (Seabrook et al., 2016). Intrinsically related to the traditional sexual script (TSS), which positions men as sexual initiators and women as sexual gatekeepers who preserve a morally sanctioned version of sex (Wiederman, 2005), the heterosexual script sets heterosexual sexual activity in monogamous, opposite sex pairings as the only socially or morally sanctioned version of sex and sexuality (Kim et al., 2007). Commonly identified scripts within these frameworks include the relational scripts emphasizing that sexual activity fosters (and is often the only acceptable measure of) intimacy between romantic partners, and procreational scripts that assert sexual activity is for having children (between married, opposite sex partners Seabrook et al., 2016). Within North American culture, dominant scripts involve the heterosexual script (Kim et al., 2007) and the traditional sexual script. Relational dialectic theory how to#In a given culture, scripts provide guidelines for behaviors and tell people how to act and communicate in social situations (Simon & Gagnon, 1986). ![]() We frame the study in sexual scripts theory and relational dialectics theory. The current project treated intimacy as the forms of communication that characterize intimate relationships, which we consider as any close relationship (e.g., romantic relationships, close friends, family or kinship networks). ![]() Scholarly definitions of intimacy tend to treat it as either a relative synonym for closeness or to indicate romantic and/or sexual relationships (Parks & Floyd, 1996). As part of a larger study on communication and intimacy, the present study will explore the role of communication in maintaining, managing, and exploring new means of intimacy during the COVID-19 crisis. In addition to more public disparities manifesting and worsening during the pandemic, women managed a changing landscape for their intimate lives and relationships. RDT also provides contrapuntal analysis, a method ideal for studying relational turning points and transitional periods of military and veteran-connected families.As the world found itself managing a chaotic new-normal during the COVID-19 pandemic, research suggests women and LGBTQ people may bear more of the burden (Craig & Churchill, 2020 Moore et al., 2021). We share an approach developed within communication, relational dialectics theory (RDT), that focuses on power from a critical perspective and offers ideas for potential positive social change. ![]() Although theories used in the past might still apply, we argue that critical theories are useful, even necessary, for studying the experiences of normative and nonnormative military families (e.g., those with same gender spouses or parents, stepfamilies), as both are nontraditional relative to their civilian counterparts. Much of this research involves normative military families (i.e., a service member husband and civilian wife with biological children) however, military families are diverse, due in part to societal and military policy changes (e.g., marriage equality repeal of “don't ask, don't tell”). Military and veteran-connected family scholarship focusing on transitions has a lengthy history across disciplines. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |